.
A: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-bristol-64785020
"You're brighter than that, you don't need to use ChatGPT," one vice chancellor tells his students. (58 kB)
B: I seen an article the other day where students studying an International Baccalaureate are allowed to use it but they have to cite it as a source.
Content created by chatbot must be treated like any other source and attributed when used, says IB
Feb 27th (95 kB)
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/feb/27/chatgpt-allowed-international-baccalaureate-essays-chatbot
A: That makes sense as I think the issues come if students were to claim it as their work
C: Jokes on the ones that don't. If you're not bright enough to use every tool available to you...
D: I think it's this bit that will be key for academic institutions... “When AI can essentially write an essay at the touch of a button, we need our pupils to master different skills, such as understanding if the essay is any good or if it has missed context, has used biased data or if it is lacking in creativity. These will be far more important skills than writing an essay, so the assessment tasks we set will need to reflect this.”
A: Yep think it has to be considered a (powerful) tool as if, as you say, Lindsey, if they ask it to create an essay without understanding the content, they're just going to trip themselves up in the future
E: I don't understand this thinking. This software isn't going to go away. Uni's need to think harder about how to accept it into their world.
.